CRC 3.1203(a) (amended eff 1/1/08).When notice of an ex parte application is given, the person giving . The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) The court decides these applications without a hearing. 6 BECKY M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 These departments may go under different names in different counties. 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 SFPKOA filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 ) ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. 11 ) ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. ) ) Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Dept. A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ) ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. 9 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 11 ) ) ) If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 Phone: 415-705-1033 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . ) 11 ) 908.) ) Department rules are available here. ) 5 ) ) 4 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. 11 ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. ) ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. ) 11 ) The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). See, e.g. ) 11 ) ) The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7:9-10.). If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM apply to most motions. 5 ) Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ), A. The comment period will run from September 14, 2022 through October 28, 2022. 5 SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. 12 REVIEW HEARING RE: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Filter by a specific county without spaces. Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Last. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 If you're before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your . ) 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Subd (m) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (i) effective July 1, 1997; previously amended and relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2004; previously relettered as subd (j) effective July 1, 2000, as subd (n) effective January 1, 2007, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2008.). The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) CCP 2031.240(c)(1). 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 5 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME ) CCP 1292.2. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 Unscheduled motions will not be heard. (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. 2 Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". ) Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. Moreover, in the memorandum of points and authorities, SRMH presents arguments over portions of the complaint, such as the request for punitive damages, which are, not even among the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 ) Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. 4:21-22; 5:22-23. (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 5 ) It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. ) 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258. Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. (CRC 3.1322.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 ) Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. ) 5 San Francisco, CA 94102 Complaint 13. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 5 Motion to Strike is denied. These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. 11 ) ) ) ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 ) Quick Links ) Board of Med. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 ) Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 11 ) Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63. CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. ) ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. ) ) The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. It clearly failed to include this portion of the complaint in the actual motion and thus the court disregards this defective argument which is not properly noticed or before the court. 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Department 22. 11 ) CCP 399(a). South San Francisco, CA 94080 . Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Com. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 5 You can always see your envelopes 6 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Valley Bank of Nevada, supra, 15 Cal.3d 658. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. (Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (f) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (k) effective January 1, 2007.). Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. 11 ) ) 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). ) 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 ) Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. ) 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 ) 3 Proc. 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. ) are-san francisco no. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2.